<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising is interesting to me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infinitivesplitter.com/2007/12/14/advertising-is-interesting-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infinitivesplitter.com/2007/12/14/advertising-is-interesting-to-me/</link>
	<description>developing better rules</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaconfire Wire &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWYDO?</title>
		<link>http://www.infinitivesplitter.com/2007/12/14/advertising-is-interesting-to-me/comment-page-1/#comment-3731</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaconfire Wire &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WWYDO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infinitivesplitter.com/2007/12/14/advertising-is-interesting-to-me/#comment-3731</guid>
		<description>[...] While it&#8217;s not present today, earlier this week, and at various times past, their homepage was adorned with a gigantic &quot;Mac vs PC&quot; ad that used both a banner and a skyscraper in tandem. While various people have opined on the ad content, including a much-dugg story on Gizmodo indicating that those weren&#8217;t really reviews to several posts praising the creativity of the ads to a post indicating that the ads tend to crash some browsers, I haven&#8217;t seen any commentary on with regard to the Times and other publications that ran the ad. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While it&#8217;s not present today, earlier this week, and at various times past, their homepage was adorned with a gigantic &quot;Mac vs PC&quot; ad that used both a banner and a skyscraper in tandem. While various people have opined on the ad content, including a much-dugg story on Gizmodo indicating that those weren&#8217;t really reviews to several posts praising the creativity of the ads to a post indicating that the ads tend to crash some browsers, I haven&#8217;t seen any commentary on with regard to the Times and other publications that ran the ad. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
